000 | 03448nmm a22003377a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20211115140749.0 | ||
008 | 211104b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
020 | _a9781509924790 (e-book) | ||
040 |
_cCvSU Main Campus Library _erda |
||
041 | _aeng | ||
050 |
_aK7625 _bK14 2020 |
||
100 |
_913488 _aKarayanidi, Milana _eauthor |
||
245 |
_aRethinking judicial jurisdiction in private international law : _bparty autonomy, categorical equality and sovereignty / _cby Milana Karayanidi. |
||
260 |
_aOxford ; London : _bHart Publishing, _c2020 |
||
300 |
_a1 online resource (271, pages) : _bcolor illustrations. |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _acomputer |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _aonline resource |
||
500 | _ahttps://portal.igpublish.com/iglibrary/obj/HARTB0001612?searchid=1636005702383b_kze~akz6tFnEoCxuuZf | ||
504 | _aInclude bibliographical references and index | ||
505 | _a 1. Introduction -- 2. Reconciliation of values in jurisdiction -- 3. Autonomy as a foundational value for jurisdiction -- 4. Autonomy in the law on jurisdiction : harmony and controversy -- 5. Categorical equality in the law on jurisdiction -- 6. Jurisdiction in tort and contract in the absence of choice of forum : balance exercise -- 7. Sovereignty and party autonomy in civil and commercial jurisdiction -- 8. Sovereignty and territoriality in the law on jurisdiction -- 9. Overall conclusions and recommendations | ||
520 | _aThis book explores the theory and practice of judicial jurisdiction within the field of private international law. It offers a revised look at values justifying the power of courts to hear and decide cross-border disputes, and demonstrates that a re-conceptualisation of jurisdiction is needed. Rather than deriving from territorial power of states, jurisdiction in civil and commercial cross-border matters ought to be driven by party autonomy. This autonomy can be limited by certain considerations of equality and critical state sovereign interests. The book applies this normative view to the existing rules of jurisdiction in the European Union and the Russian Federation. These regimes are chosen due to their unique positions towards values in private international law and contrasting societal norms that generate and accommodate these values. Notwithstanding disparate cultural and political ideas, these regimes reveal a surprising level of consistency when it comes to enforcement of party autonomy. There is, nevertheless, room for improvement. The book demonstrates to scholars, policy makers and lawmakers that jurisdiction should be re-centred around the interests of private actors, and proposes ways to improve the current rules. | ||
541 |
_aFund 164 _bCE-Logic, Inc. _cPurchased _dMarch 2, 2021 _eOEBP000164 _fP. Roderno _hPHP 15,558.00 _p2021-03-110 _q7813 to 7820 |
||
650 | 0 |
_913489 _aConflict of laws _xJurisdiction |
|
650 | 0 |
_913489 _aConflict of laws _xJurisdiction _zEuropean Union countries |
|
650 | 0 |
_913489 _aConflict of laws _xJurisdiction _zRussia (Federation) |
|
856 |
_uhttps://portal.igpublish.com/iglibrary/obj/HARTB0001612?searchid=1636005702383b_kze~akz6tFnEoCxuuZf _yClick here to read Full-Text E-Book |
||
856 |
_uhttps://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfSoAj3qM4b_ttQMZLuimqgwkfHDH1NyJ7S4eyjHD7Vr4j7EQ/viewform _yLog-in to the website is required to read this e-book. Click here to request access. |
||
942 |
_2lcc _cOEB |
||
999 |
_c34810 _d34810 |