000 | 02799nam a2200301 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20240426095337.0 | ||
008 | 070419s19uu xx 00 eng d | ||
040 | _cCvSU Main Campus Library | ||
041 | 0 | _aeng | |
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a635.65 _bC86 1997 |
100 | 1 | 0 |
_aCresino, Neshley C. _eauthor |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aUtilization of ben residues as extender in meat loaf / _cby Neshley C. Cresino |
260 | 0 |
_aIndang, Cavite : _bCavite State University- Main Campus, _c1997. |
|
300 |
_a60 pages : _billustrations ; _c28 cm. |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume |
||
500 | _aApplied Research IV (Agri-Science Curriculum) Don Severino Agricultural College. | ||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references. | ||
508 | _aScience High School, College of Education (CED) | ||
520 | 3 | _aCRESINO NESHLEY CREENCIA, "UTILIZATION OF BEAN RESIDUES AS EXTENDERS 1N MEAT LOAF" An. Investigatory Project submitted to the Faculty ot Don Severino Agricultural College. Indang. Cavite. The study was conducted to evaluate the physical, proximate, and sensory attributes of meat loaves made with bean extenders: and to determine the production cost of meat loaves made with bean residues. There were seven treatments used in the study: T1 ~ 100% meat: T2 - 75% meat and 25% soybean residue; T3 - 50% meat and 50% soybean residue: T4 - 75% meat and 25% cowpea residue; T5 - 50% meat and 50% cowpea residue: T6 - 75% meat and 25% mung bean residue; and T7 - 50% meat and 50% mung bean residue. Complete Randomized Design (CRD) was used for the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and the Duncan New Multiple Range Test (DNMRT) to compare differences among treatment means. It was found out that Treatment 7 (50% mungbean) was the bass meatloaf in terms of physical and proximate composition. This was followed by Treatment 5 (50% cowpea), while the least was Treatment 1 (100% meat). But this pattern is in contrast with the results obtained in sensory evaluation. It was revealed that the control was the most preferred than the other meatloaf formulations. Treatment 4 (25% cowpea) was rated next to the control, while Treatment 7 (50% mungbean) was most disliked. It was found out that meat loaf made with cowpea residue could be used as substitute for pork up to 50% level of substitute, while soybean and mungbean could be used as substitutes to pork up to 25% level of substitute . | |
541 |
_cSubmitted to the University Library _d _eR-257 |
||
650 | 0 |
_aBeans _95688 |
|
690 |
_91282 _aScience High School _xAgri-Science Curriculum |
||
856 |
_yClick here to view thesis abstract and table of contents _uhttp://library.cvsu.edu.ph/cgi-bin/koha/opac-retrieve-file.pl?id=2479c8bad80e17956f8c47c9057898d5 |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cMAN |
||
999 |
_c754 _d754 |