000 | 03026nam a2200313 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20230302134547.0 | ||
008 | 091210s19uu xx 00 eng d | ||
040 | _cCvSU Main Campus Library | ||
041 | 0 | _aeng | |
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a519.5 _bAp1 2009 |
100 |
_aApalla, Pamela V. _915026 _eauthor |
||
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAn item analysis of statistics I midterm examination administered to Statistics I students of Cavite State University / _cby Pamela V. Apalla. |
260 | 0 |
_aIndang, Cavite : _c2009. _bCavite State University- Main Campus, |
|
300 |
_av, 49 pages : _billustrations ; _c28 cm. |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume |
||
500 | _aSpecial Problem (BS Applied Mathematics--Statistics) Cavite State University | ||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references. | ||
508 | _aCollege of Arts and Science (CAS) | ||
520 | 3 | _aAPALLA, PAMELA VICEDO, "An Item Analysis of Statistics 1 Midterm Examination Administered to Statistics 1 Students of Cavite State University, Second Semester, SY 2008-2009". A special problem. Bachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics (with specialization in Statistics), Cavite State University, Indang Cavite. Adviser: Jocelyn L. Reyes. This study was conducted from January to March 2009 at the Department of Physical Science, College of Arts and Sciences, Cavite State University. This study subjected to an item analysis a 30-multiple-choice-item midterm examination in Statistics 1 administered to 303 students. A sample size computed by Slovin's formula yield 172 respondents. Only 92 out of 172, based on item analysis procedure, were considered as members of the high and low groups.This study aimed to determine level of difficulty, the level of discrimination and the effectiveness of the distractors of each item in departmentalized midterm examination in Statistics 1. Likewise, the reliability of departmentalized midterm examination was also measured. The source of data was the answer sheets to the midterm examination. Using the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20, the computed reliability coefficient was 0.44 which implied high reliability; hence, the items were significantly related to each item. Discrimination index, the numerical description of the extent to which success on an item corresponds to success on the whole test, was computed from equal-sized high and low scoring groups. Seventeen items were satisfactorily prepared since they had effective distractors. Majority of the test items were reasonably good in discrimination and the exam had average difficulty | |
541 |
_cSubmitted to the University Library _d08-10-2009 _eSP-4070 |
||
650 | 0 |
_aStatistics _9288 |
|
690 |
_92526 _aBachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics _xStatistics |
||
700 |
_aReyes, Jocelyn L. _933765 _eadviser |
||
856 |
_uhttp://library.cvsu.edu.ph/cgi-bin/koha/opac-retrieve-file.pl?id=f9c8da7e287b19f95ea5e4d7713efcc7 _yClick here to view thesis abstract and table of contents |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cMAN |
||
999 |
_c7787 _d7787 |