A Survey of some personal characteristics, investment and income of small farmers / by Gregoria M. Romero.

By: Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Indang, Cavite : Don Severino Agricultural College, 1973.Description: 34 pages : illustrations ; 28 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 331.7631 R66 1973
Online resources: Production credits:
  • College of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Natural Resources (CAFENR)
Abstract: The study was conducted in two selected barrios in Indang, Cavite from August through November 1972 to determine the farm investment and income of the farmers in the two barrios and to study the problems associated with their farm operations. crop area and capital investment. The average size of cropland per farm was 3.53 hectares. They effective crop area was 1.53 hectares. The two barrios had the same size of cropland with only a very slight difference in effective crop area. Owners had the largest size of cropland. The effective crop area and the tenant had the smallest: The highest gross receipts per farm and per hectare were obtained from vegetables. Among the crops grown, corn had the lowest gross receipts per hectare. Other crops grown were upland rice, fruits, coconut, coffee, and root crops. The capital investment of 50 farms averaged 19,931.00 by barrios. The farm investment per farm was about the same. Part-owners had the highest investment with an average of 22,188.00, owners - 19,569.00 and the tenants 16,041.00 The net farm earnings per far averaged to 635.00, operators farm labor earnings was 268.00, family farm labor earnings was 409.00 and family income from all 4 D On sources . 529.00. Earning from all measure of profits were O highest among owners. The lowest was among the tenants. On the other hand, the return from all these different measures were higher in Guyam than in Tambo-Munting Kulit. There was a positive relationship of the returns from farming, effective crop area and capital investment. The farmers’ problems were high cost of fertilizer, low and uncertainty of future prices, prevalence of crop pests and diseases, and delayed payment of the crop. Twenty-five farmers had obtained credit from Rural bank and 17 farmers from other sources, such as: relatives neighbors and other money lenders.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Special Problem (BS Agriculture- - Agricultural Economics) Don Severino Agricultural College.

Includes bibliographical references.

College of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Natural Resources (CAFENR)


The study was conducted in two selected barrios in Indang, Cavite from August through November 1972 to determine the farm investment and income of the farmers in the two barrios and to study the problems associated with their farm operations. crop area and capital investment. The average size of cropland per farm was 3.53 hectares. They effective crop area was 1.53 hectares. The two barrios had the same size of cropland with only a very slight difference in effective crop area.

Owners had the largest size of cropland. The effective crop area and the tenant had the smallest: The highest gross receipts per farm and per hectare were obtained from vegetables. Among the crops grown, corn had the lowest gross receipts per hectare. Other crops grown were upland rice, fruits, coconut, coffee, and root crops. The capital investment of 50 farms averaged 19,931.00 by barrios. The farm investment per farm was about the same. Part-owners had the highest investment with an average of 22,188.00, owners - 19,569.00 and the tenants 16,041.00 The net farm earnings per far averaged to 635.00, operators farm labor earnings was 268.00, family farm labor earnings was 409.00 and family income from all 4 D On sources . 529.00. Earning from all measure of profits were O highest among owners.

The lowest was among the tenants. On the other hand, the return from all these different measures were higher in Guyam than in Tambo-Munting Kulit. There was a positive relationship of the returns from farming, effective crop area and capital investment. The farmers’ problems were high cost of fertilizer, low and uncertainty of future prices, prevalence of crop pests and diseases, and delayed payment of the crop. Twenty-five farmers had obtained credit from Rural bank and 17 farmers from other sources, such as: relatives neighbors and other money lenders.

Submitted to the University Library SP-6

Copyright © 2024. Cavite State University | Koha 23.05