Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Effect of treating rice straw with urea & molasses on growth performance & carcass & meat quality traits of goat / by Jerwin Q. Atayde.

By:

Atayde, Jerwin Q [author]

Contributor(s):

Bunan, Andrew T [adviser]

Material type: Text

TextLanguage: English Publication details: Indang, Cavite, 1999. Cavite State University- Main Campus,Description: xiii, 45 pages : illustrations ; 28 cmContent type:

text

Media type:

unmediated

Carrier type:

volume

Subject(s):

DDC classification:

636.39 At1 1999

Online resources:

Click here to view thesis abstract and table of contents

Production credits:

College of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Natural Resources (CAFENR)

Abstract: Atayde, Jerwin Querijero, Cavite State University, Indang, Cavite, April 1999. "Effect of Treating Rice Straw With Urea and Molasses on Growth Performance and Carcass and Meat Quality Traits of Goat". Dr. Andrew T. Bunan, Adviser. A study was conducted to determine the effect of treating rice straw with urea and molasses on the growth performance and carcass and meat quality traits of goat and the sensory properties of "Mare”. The following treatments were used: Treatment 1, rice straw with molasses (control) and Treatment 1, rice straw with urea and molasses (experimental). Results revealed that body weight of goats had no significant differences (P>0.05) throughout the study. However, those fed the experimental diet were relatively heavier than the control. Feed consumption of the treated goats was significantly lower (P>0.05) in the last week of the experiment. However, total feed consumption did not vary (P>0.05) between the two groups. Although not significant, the total feed consumption appeared to be inversely related to the final body weight of the two groups. It is worth nothing that the treated group which had higher body weight had lower feed consumption than the untreated group. The two treatments had no significant differences ((P>0.05) on average feed conversion efficiency, although that of the treated group was 19.36 kg lower than that of the untreated group. On the other hand, dressing percentage, gain in weight and fabrication of the two treatments had no significant differences. Treatment 2 had higher marbling content than Treatment 1.Sensory evaluation showed that the two treatments did not significantly differ (P>0.05) in terms of color, odor, tenderness, off-flavor, juiciness and general acceptability. In terms of chevon flavor, Treatment 1 is significantly (P<0.05) different from Treatment 2.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 5 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Collection	Call number	Materials specified	URL	Status	Notes	Date due	Barcode
Theses / Manuscripts	Ladislao N. Diwa Memorial Library Theses Section	Non-fiction	636.39 At1 1999 (Browse shelf(Opens below))		Link to resource	Room use only	T-1881		00006316

Thesis (B.S.A.--Animal Science) Cavite State University

Includes bibliographical references.

College of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Natural Resources (CAFENR)

Atayde, Jerwin Querijero, Cavite State University, Indang, Cavite, April 1999. "Effect of Treating Rice Straw With Urea and Molasses on Growth Performance and Carcass and Meat Quality Traits of Goat". Dr. Andrew T. Bunan, Adviser.
A study was conducted to determine the effect of treating rice straw with urea and molasses on the growth performance and carcass and meat quality traits of goat and the sensory properties of "Mare”. The following treatments were used: Treatment 1, rice straw with molasses (control) and Treatment 1, rice straw with urea and molasses (experimental). Results revealed that body weight of goats had no significant differences (P>0.05) throughout the study. However, those fed the experimental diet were relatively heavier than the control. Feed consumption of the treated goats was significantly lower (P>0.05) in the last week of the experiment. However, total feed consumption did not vary (P>0.05) between the two groups. Although not significant, the total feed consumption appeared to be inversely related to the final body weight of the two groups. It is worth nothing that the treated group which had higher body weight had lower feed consumption than the untreated group.
The two treatments had no significant differences ((P>0.05) on average feed conversion efficiency, although that of the treated group was 19.36 kg lower than that of the untreated group. On the other hand, dressing percentage, gain in weight and fabrication of the two treatments had no significant differences.
Treatment 2 had higher marbling content than Treatment 1.Sensory evaluation showed that the two treatments did not significantly differ (P>0.05) in terms of color, odor, tenderness, off-flavor, juiciness and general acceptability. In terms of chevon flavor, Treatment 1 is significantly (P<0.05) different from Treatment 2.

Submitted to the University Library 05/10/2007 T-1881