Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Production of cement board from coffee hull / by Amyel Dale L. Cero, Kayra Lianna S. Lagahid, Jaecel Reyenne L. Lapitan.

By:

Ceo, Amyel Dale L [author]

Contributor(s):

Material type: Text

TextLanguage: English Publication details: Indang, Cavite: Cavite State University- Main Campus, 2006.Description: xix, 49 pages : illustrations ; 28 cmContent type:

text

Media type:

unmediated

Carrier type:

volume

Subject(s):

DDC classification:

674.836 C33 2006

Online resources:

Click here to view thesis abstract and table of contents

Production credits:

Science High School, College of Education (CED)

Abstract: CERO, AMYEL DALE L., KAYRA LIANNA S. LAGAHID, and JAECEL REYENNE L. LAPITAN. Production of Cement Board from Coffee Hull. Applied Research III (General Science Curriculum). Cavite State University - Science High School, Indang, Cavite. April 2006. Adviser: Engr. Renato B. Cubilla The research study aimed to: determine the feasibility of using coffee hull as a component in making cement board; investigate the properties of cement board made from coffee hull; and determine the treatment that will produce the best results of cement board from coffee hull. It was conducted from November 2005 to January 2006. The production of the cement boards was done at the Forest Products Research and Development Institute (FPRDI), University of the Philippines Los Banos, Laguna. The proportions used were based on the treatment design of the study, which was suggested by the FPRDI. They were as follows: T, - 20 percent coffee hull and 80 percent cement; T2- 30 percent coffee hull and 70 percent cement; T3- 40 percent coffee hull and 60 percent cement. There were four property tests done. For the mechanical property tests, Modulus of Rupture and Nail Head Pull Through Test were done while for the physical property tests, Thickness Swelling and Water Absorption tests were done. The tests showed that in terms of mechanical properties, Treatment 1 (20% coffee hull and 80% cement) yielded the best results while Treatment 3 (40% coffee hull and 60% cement) yielded the lowest values. In terms of physical properties, Treatment 2 (30% coffee hull and 70% cement) yielded the best results while coffee hull and 60% cement) had the lowest results. Lastly, statistical analyses showed that Treatments 1 and 2 yielded comparable results.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 5 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Collection	Call number	Materials specified	URL	Status	Notes	Date due	Barcode
Theses / Manuscripts	Ladislao N. Diwa Memorial Library Theses Section	Non-fiction	674.836 C33 2006 (Browse shelf(Opens below))		Link to resource	Room use only	R-495		00000964

Research Study (Applied Research IV - - General Science Curriculum) Cavite State University.

Includes bibliographical references.

Science High School, College of Education (CED)

CERO, AMYEL DALE L., KAYRA LIANNA S. LAGAHID, and JAECEL REYENNE L. LAPITAN. Production of Cement Board from Coffee Hull. Applied Research III (General Science Curriculum). Cavite State University - Science High School, Indang, Cavite. April 2006. Adviser: Engr. Renato B. Cubilla

The research study aimed to: determine the feasibility of using coffee hull as a component in making cement board; investigate the properties of cement board made from coffee hull; and determine the treatment that will produce the best results of cement board from coffee hull. It was conducted from November 2005 to January 2006. The production of the cement boards was done at the Forest Products Research and Development Institute (FPRDI), University of the Philippines Los Banos, Laguna.

The proportions used were based on the treatment design of the study, which was suggested by the FPRDI. They were as follows: T, - 20 percent coffee hull and 80 percent cement; T2- 30 percent coffee hull and 70 percent cement; T3- 40 percent coffee hull and 60 percent cement.

There were four property tests done. For the mechanical property tests, Modulus of Rupture and Nail Head Pull Through Test were done while for the physical property tests, Thickness Swelling and Water Absorption tests were done.

The tests showed that in terms of mechanical properties, Treatment 1 (20% coffee hull and 80% cement) yielded the best results while Treatment 3 (40% coffee hull and 60% cement) yielded the lowest values. In terms of physical properties, Treatment 2 (30% coffee hull and 70% cement) yielded the best results while coffee hull and 60% cement) had the lowest results. Lastly, statistical analyses showed that Treatments 1 and 2 yielded comparable results.

Submitted to the University Library R - 495