Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Level of awareness on Republic Act No. 10586 also known as anti-drunk and drugged driving act of 2013 in Tagaytay City / Russell R. Alcazar.

By:

Alcazar, Russell R [author]

Contributor(s):

Material type: Text

TextLanguage: English Publication details: Indang, Cavite, 2018. Cavite State University- Main Campus,Description: xv, 53p. col. : ill. ; 28 cm. illustrations ; cmContent type:

text

Media type:

unmediated

Carrier type:

volume

Subject(s):

DDC classification:

345 Al1 2018

Online resources:

View Abstract

Production credits:

College of Criminal Justice (CCJ)

Abstract: ALCAZAR, RUSSELL R, MALANO, ZAIDA L. AND PERIDO, CIARRA MARIEL R. Level of awareness on Republic Act No. 10586 also known as Anti-Drunk and Drugged Driving Act of 2013 in Tagaytay City. Undergraduate Thesis, Bachelor of Science in Criminology. Cavite State University, Indang, Cavite. April 2018. Dr. Marissa C. Lontoc. The study was conducted to evaluate the level of awareness of the TOPS (Tagaytay Office of Public Safety), Public Utility Drivers and Private drivers on Republic Act No. 10586 otherwise known as Anti-Drunk and Drugged Driving Act of 2013 in Tagaytay City. It aimed to evaluate the level of awareness of the TOPS, public utility drivers and private drivers in terms of implementing rules, implementing strategies and penalty for violation of the law and to determine the significant difference among the level of awareness on Republic Act No. 10586 also known as Anti-drunk and Drugged Driving Act of 2013 of the TOPS, public utility drivers and private drivers. The descriptive quantitative research design was used in this study in order to asses the level of awareness on the implementing rules, strategies used and the penalty for the violation of this law. Based on the findings, it was found that among the three respondents. TOPS has the highest level of awareness than the two categories of drivers. These drivers are knowledgeable in the implementing rules, implementing strategies and penalty for the violation of the law. There is a significant difference on the level of awareness of the public utility driver, TOPS and private driver on implementing rules and implementing strategies of this law wherein, in terms of penalty there is no significant difference on the level of awareness of public utility driver and private driver while TOPS has a significant difference on their level of awareness on penalty for the violation of law.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 5 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Collection	Call number	Materials specified	Status	Notes	Date due	Barcode
Theses / Manuscripts	Ladislao N. Diwa Memorial Library Theses Section	Non-fiction	345 Al1 2018 (Browse shelf(Opens below))		Room use only	T-7895		00017936

Thesis (Bachelor of Science in Criminology) Cavite State University.

Includes bibliographical references.

College of Criminal Justice (CCJ)

ALCAZAR, RUSSELL R, MALANO, ZAIDA L. AND PERIDO, CIARRA MARIEL R. Level of awareness on Republic Act No. 10586 also known as Anti-Drunk and Drugged Driving Act of 2013 in Tagaytay City. Undergraduate Thesis, Bachelor of Science in Criminology. Cavite State University, Indang, Cavite. April 2018. Dr. Marissa C. Lontoc.
The study was conducted to evaluate the level of awareness of the TOPS (Tagaytay Office of Public Safety), Public Utility Drivers and Private drivers on Republic Act No. 10586 otherwise known as Anti-Drunk and Drugged Driving Act of 2013 in Tagaytay City. It aimed to evaluate the level of awareness of the TOPS, public utility drivers and private drivers in terms of implementing rules, implementing strategies and penalty for violation of the law and to determine the significant difference among the level of awareness on Republic Act No. 10586 also known as Anti-drunk and Drugged Driving Act of 2013 of the TOPS, public utility drivers and private drivers. The descriptive quantitative research design was used in this study in order to asses the level of awareness on the implementing rules, strategies used and the penalty for the violation of this law.
Based on the findings, it was found that among the three respondents. TOPS has the highest level of awareness than the two categories of drivers. These drivers are knowledgeable in the implementing rules, implementing strategies and penalty for the violation of the law. There is a significant difference on the level of awareness of the public utility driver, TOPS and private driver on implementing rules and implementing strategies of this law wherein, in terms of penalty there is no significant difference on the level of awareness of public utility driver and private driver while TOPS has a significant difference on their level of awareness on penalty for the violation of law.

Submitted to the University Library July 02, 2018 T-7895