Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Growth and yield response of mungo to methods of planting and fertilization / by Milagros M. Viado.

By:

Viado, Milagros M [author]

Material type: Text

TextLanguage: English Publication details: Indang, Cavite : 1980. Cavite State University- Main Campus,Description: 18 pages : illustrations ; 28 cmContent type:

text

Media type:

unmediated

Carrier type:

volume

Subject(s):

DDC classification:

635.65 V66 1980

Online resources:

Click here to view thesis abstract and table of contents

Production credits:

College of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Natural Resources (CAFENR)

Abstract: This study, "Growth and Yield Response of Mungo to Methods of Planting and Fertilization", using CES 87 variety was conducted at the Experimental Field of the Don Severino Agricultural College, Indang, Cavite from July to October, 1979. Its main objective was to determine the effects of the combination of methods of planting and fertilization on the growth and yield of mungo. The specific objectives were: to find out the effect of different rates of complete ferti-lizer on the growth and yield of mungo (Treatments were: T1 - 158 grams per plot, T2 - 315 grams per plot, T3 - 467 grams per plot) and to find out which of the two methods of planting would give a higher yield. The following growth and yield parameters were observed and taken throughout the conduct of the study: total grain yield, weight per 1,000 seeds, pods per branch, pods per plant, number of leaves, and number of branches and dry matter yield. Of the parameters above, non-significant differences were observed among treatments. However, Treatment 3 of the drill method produced the highest yield and highest weight per 1,000 seeds. It was followed by Treatment 2 (315 grams per plot) and least, Treatment 1 (158 grams per plot).

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 5 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Collection	Call number	Materials specified	URL	Status	Notes	Date due	Barcode
Theses / Manuscripts	Ladislao N. Diwa Memorial Library Theses Section	Non-fiction	635.65 V66 1980 (Browse shelf(Opens below))		Link to resource	Room use only	SP-453		00006967

Browsing Ladislao N. Diwa Memorial Library shelves, Shelving location: Theses Section, Collection: Non-fiction Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	635.65 T431985 Proper management in mongo and peanut production /	635.65 T63 1990 Maximizing land utilization through mongo and corn cropping pattern /	635.65 Um2 1986 Proper management in mongo production /	635.65 V66 1980 Growth and yield response of mungo to methods of planting and fertilization /	635.65 V66 1989 Mungo production using rhizobium inoculation technique /	635.65 V66b 1978 Correlation between linear density and distance of furrows in mungbean /	635.651 V58 1984 Response of mungbean to different tillage operations /	Next

Special Problem (BSA--Agronomy) Don Severino Agricultural College

Includes bibliographical references.

College of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Natural Resources (CAFENR)

This study, "Growth and Yield Response of Mungo to Methods of Planting and Fertilization", using CES 87 variety was conducted at the Experimental Field of the Don Severino Agricultural College, Indang, Cavite from July to October, 1979. Its main objective was to determine the effects of the combination of methods of planting and fertilization on the growth and yield of mungo. The specific objectives were: to find out the effect of different rates of complete ferti-lizer on the growth and yield of mungo (Treatments were: T1 - 158 grams per plot, T2 - 315 grams per plot, T3 - 467 grams per plot) and to find out which of the two methods of planting would give a higher yield. The following growth and yield parameters were observed and taken throughout the conduct of the study: total grain yield, weight per 1,000 seeds, pods per branch, pods per plant, number of leaves, and number of branches and dry matter yield. Of the parameters above, non-significant differences were observed among treatments. However, Treatment 3 of the drill method produced the highest yield and highest weight per 1,000 seeds. It was followed by Treatment 2 (315 grams per plot) and least, Treatment 1 (158 grams per plot).

Submitted to the University Library 03-10-1980 SP-453