Apologizing strategies of selected BA English Language Studies students during synchronous classes / by Lloyd Chester R. Diamante, Mikaela A. Fajardo, Lawrence Jay A. Sotomayor.

By:

Diamante, Lloyd Chester R [author]

Contributor(s):

Material type: Text

TextLanguage: English Publication details: Indang, Cavite : Cavite State University-Main Campus, 2022.Description: x, 59 pages : illustrations ; 28 mContent type:

text

Media type:

unmediated

Carrier type:

volume

Subject(s):

DDC classification:

371.35 D54 2022

Online resources:

Click here to view the Abstract and Table of Contents

Production credits:

College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)

Abstract: DIAMANTE, LLOYD CHESTER R., FAJARDO, MIKAELA A., and SOTOMAYOR, LAWRENCE JAY A. Apologizing Strategies of selected BA English Language Studies students during synchronous classes. Undergraduate Thesis. Bachelor of Arts in English Language Studies. Cavite State University, Indang, Cavite. June 2022. Adviser: Ms. Charita C. Troyo. This study was carried out to determine the apologizing strategies of selected BA English Language Studies students during synchronous classes. Specifically, it aimed to: (a) determine the preferred apology strategies used during their synchronous classes of selected BAELS students; (b) identify the types of apology strategies used by selected BAELS students during synchronous classes; (c) point out the factors that influence the apology utterance of selected BAELS students. A total of 30 selected BA English Language Studies students from the College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Humanities at Cavite State University Indang, Cavite served as the participants of the study. Purposive sampling was used in selecting the participants of the study. Researchers analyzed, utilized and categorized the respondents' responses on the survey questionnaire by the assistance of Cohen and Olshtain (1981, in Elham 2016) evaluation and classification of how people apologized, which they classified into five techniques of apologizing: (1) IFID (Illocutionary Force Indicating Device); (2) Explain or Account; (3) Promise of Forbearance; (4) An offer of repair; (5) Taking on responsibility: (a) Explicit self-blame; (b) Lack of intent; (c) Expression of self-deficiency; (d) Expression of embarrassment; (e) Self-castigation; (f) Justify the hearer. Results showed that, most of the respondents preferred using "Explain or Account" type of apologizing strategies as it can vindicate misunderstanding, unintentional actions and uncontrollable phenomenon.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Collection	Call number	Materials specified	URL	Status	Notes	Date due	Barcode
Theses / Manuscripts	Ladislao N. Diwa Memorial Library Theses Section	Non-fiction	371.35 D54 2022 (Browse shelf(Opens below))		Link to resource	Room use only	T-9131		00083508

Thesis (Bachelor of Arts in English Language Studies) Cavite State University.

Includes bibliographical references.

College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)

DIAMANTE, LLOYD CHESTER R., FAJARDO, MIKAELA A., and SOTOMAYOR, LAWRENCE JAY A.

Apologizing Strategies of selected BA English Language Studies students during synchronous classes. Undergraduate Thesis. Bachelor of Arts in English Language Studies. Cavite State University, Indang, Cavite. June 2022. Adviser: Ms. Charita C. Troyo. This study was carried out to determine the apologizing strategies of selected BA English Language Studies students during synchronous classes. Specifically, it aimed to: (a) determine the preferred apology strategies used during their synchronous classes of selected BAELS students; (b) identify the types of apology strategies used by selected BAELS students during synchronous classes; (c) point out the factors that influence the apology utterance of selected BAELS students. A total of 30 selected BA English Language Studies students from the College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Humanities at Cavite State University Indang, Cavite served as the participants of the study. Purposive sampling was used in selecting the participants of the study. Researchers analyzed, utilized and categorized the respondents' responses on the survey questionnaire by the assistance of Cohen and Olshtain (1981, in Elham 2016) evaluation and classification of how people apologized, which they classified into five techniques of apologizing: (1) IFID (Illocutionary Force Indicating Device); (2) Explain or Account; (3) Promise of Forbearance; (4) An offer of repair; (5) Taking on responsibility: (a) Explicit self-blame; (b) Lack of intent; (c) Expression of self-deficiency; (d) Expression of embarrassment; (e) Self-castigation; (f) Justify the hearer. Results showed that, most of the respondents preferred using "Explain or Account" type of apologizing strategies as it can vindicate misunderstanding, unintentional actions and uncontrollable phenomenon.

Submitted to the University Library 07/25/2022 T-9131

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer