Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Evaluation of quality pork tocino packed in different packages materials / by Jesus Rey R. Ferolino.

By:

Ferolino, Jesus Rey R [author]

Contributor(s):

Labrador, Teresita M [adviser]

Material type: Text

TextLanguage: English Publication details: Indang, Cavite, 1995. Cavite State University- Main Campus,Description: 52 pages : illustrations ; 28 cmContent type:

text

Media type:

unmediated

Carrier type:

volume

Subject(s):

DDC classification:

664.9 F39 1995

Online resources:

Click here to view thesis abstract and table of contents

Production credits:

College of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Natural Resources (CAFENR)

Abstract: FEROLINO, JESUS REY ROSANES Don Severino Agricultural College Indanc4, Cavite, April 1995 "Evaluation of Quality - Pork Tocino Packed in Different Packaging Materials". Prof. Teresita M. Labrador, Adviser. A study was conducted to (a) determine the sensory qualities of pork tocino packed in different packaging materials; (b) evaluate which packaging material will inhibit early deterioration of tocino; and (c.) determine which packaging material is more economical to use. Three treatments were used: Treatment ordinary plastic; Treatment 2 self-sealed polyethylene plastic; and Treatment 3 styrofoam covered with cellulose film. Samples were evaluated using sensory test and microbial analysis. Sensory evaluation was conducted once a week for 11 weeks, using ten laboratory panelists. Results revealed that Treatment self-sealed polyethylene plastic, had the highest sensory mean score juiciness, for color, tenderness, pork flavor, slightly detectable off-flavor and acceptability throughout the duration of the study. Microbial analysis likewise revealed that Treatment 2 had the least microbial count. Pork tocino packed in ordinary plastic was observed to be the most attractive and had the best color. Tocino packed in ordinary plastic had the lowest production cost. The use of self-sealed polyethylene caused 0.40% increase in production cost while the use of styrofoam with cellulose film had a 2.08%A in production cost with reference to the tocino packed in ordinary plastic.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 5 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Collection	Call number	Materials specified	Status	Notes	Date due	Barcode
Theses / Manuscripts	Ladislao N. Diwa Memorial Library Theses Section	Non-fiction	664.9 F39 1995 (Browse shelf(Opens below))		Room use only	T-1620		00006246

Thesis (B.S.A.--Animal Science) Don Severino Agricultural College

Includes bibliographical references.

College of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Natural Resources (CAFENR)

FEROLINO, JESUS REY ROSANES Don Severino Agricultural College Indanc4, Cavite, April 1995 "Evaluation of Quality - Pork Tocino Packed in Different Packaging Materials". Prof. Teresita M. Labrador, Adviser.
A study was conducted to (a) determine the sensory qualities of pork tocino packed in different packaging materials; (b) evaluate which packaging material will inhibit early deterioration of tocino; and (c.) determine which packaging material is more economical to use. Three treatments were used: Treatment ordinary plastic; Treatment 2 self-sealed polyethylene plastic; and Treatment 3 styrofoam covered with cellulose film. Samples were evaluated using sensory test and microbial analysis. Sensory evaluation was conducted once a week for 11 weeks, using ten laboratory panelists. Results revealed that Treatment self-sealed polyethylene plastic, had the highest sensory mean score juiciness, for color, tenderness, pork flavor, slightly detectable off-flavor and acceptability throughout the duration of the study. Microbial analysis likewise revealed that Treatment 2 had the least microbial count.
Pork tocino packed in ordinary plastic was observed to be the most attractive and had the best color. Tocino packed in ordinary plastic had the lowest production cost. The use of self-sealed polyethylene caused 0.40% increase in production cost while the use of styrofoam with cellulose film had a 2.08%A in production cost with reference to the tocino packed in ordinary plastic.

Submitted to the University Library 07/18/2007 T-1620